0. Prólogo 
1. Perspectivas diversas de la ciencia abierta 
1.1 El contexto de la ciencia abierta 
1.2 Definiciones de la ciencia abierta 
1.3 Responsabilidad en la investigación e innovación 
1.4 Valores de Merton y Ciencia abierta 
1.5 Preocupación por la equidad e inclusión en la ciencia abierta 
1.5.1 Perspectiva constructivista 
1.5.2 Perspectiva de la ciencia abierta desde la filosofía de la ciencia 
1.6 El acceso abierto 
1.7 Propuestas de cambios en el sistema de evaluación científica 
1.8 El acceso abierto en Latinoamérica
1.8.1 Conocimiento del acceso abierto en Argentina, México y Brasil 
1.8.2 El acceso abierto en Argentina 
1.8.3 Los investigadores argentinos y el acceso abierto 
1.8.4 El acceso abierto en la Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Repositorio de publicaciones 
1.8.5 Portal Revistas UNR 
1.8.6 Investigaciones sobre acceso abierto en la UNR 
1.9 Los datos de investigación 
1.9.1 Tipos de datos 
2 Compartir datos de investigación 
2.1 El contexto internacional 
2.2 El contexto argentino 
2.3 Compartir datos de investigación 
2.4 Políticas de las revistas 
2.5 Revistas de datos (‘data journals’) 
2.6 La opinión de los investigadores: incentivos y barreras 
2.7 Incentivos para compartir y usar datos de investigación 
2.8 Barreras para compartir datos de investigación (sistemas de evaluación científica) 
2.9 Dimensiones y variables en relación con la literatura relevada 
2.9.1 Aspectos éticos y legales 
3. Los repositorios de datos 
3.1 Definiciones y tipología 
3.1.1 Tipos de repositorios de datos 
3.1.2 Repositorios Digitales Confiables (TDR) 
3.2 Curación de datos de investigación 
3.3 Estándares y calidad de datos. FAIR 
3.4 Replicación, reproducibilidad y reutilización 
3.5 Necesidad de curadores de datos 
3.5.1 ¿Qué es un curador de datos (‘data steward’)?
3.5.2 Curación de datos en bibliotecas y repositorios 
3.5.3 Capacitación de investigadores 
3.6 Valor de los repositorios datos 
3.7 La autora 
4. Referencias 

Abadal, Ernest. & Anglada, Lluis. (2020). Ciencia abierta: cómo han evolucionado la
denominación y el concepto. Anales de documentación (Vol. 23, No. 1).
https://doi.org/10.6018/analesdoc.378171
Abadal, Ernest; Abad García, María Francisca; Anglada i de Ferrer, Lluis; Boté-
Vericad, Juan José; Esteve, Asunción; González-Teruel, Aurora; Labastida i Juan,
Ignasi; López-Borrull, Alexandre; Ollé i Castellà, Candela; Melero Melero,
Remedios; Rodríguez-Gairín, Josep-Manuel & Santos-Hermosa, Gema. (2023).
Ciencia abierta en España 2023: informe de situación y análisis de la percepción.
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/200020
Agosti, Donald; Alonso Garcia, Enrique; Appleyard, Baden; Bruch, Christoph; Chen,
Robert; Clement, Gail; Egloff, Willi; Gruttemeier, Herbert; Hodson, Simon;
Llosent, Maria; Minster, J. Bernard & Uhlir, Paul F. (2016). Legal interoperability
of research data: principles and implementation guidelines. RDA-CODATA Legal
Interoperability Interest Group. Version 1.0. https://gfzpublic.gfzpotsdam.
de/rest/items/item_2042216_2/component/file_2042217/content
Akdeniz, Esra; Borschewski, Kerrin Emilia; Breuer, Johannes & Voronin, Yevhen.
(2023). Sharing social media data: The role of past experiences, attitudes,
norms, and perceived behavioral control. Frontiers in big Data, 5, 971974.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2022.971974
Ali-Khan, Sarah E.; Jean, Antoine; MacDonald, Emily & Gold, E. Richard (2018).
Defining Success in Open Science. MNI Open Research, 2(2), 2.
https://doi.org/10.12688/mniopenres.12780.2
Anglada, Lluis, & Abadal, Ernest. (2018). ¿Qué es la ciencia abierta? Anuario
ThinkEPI, 12, 292-298. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2018.43
Allen, Christopher & Mehler, David M. (2019). Open science challenges, benefits and
tips in early career and beyond. PLoS biology, 17(5), e3000246.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246
Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael; Vidal-Infer, Antonio; Alonso-Arroyo, Adolfo; Peset,
Fernanda & Ferrer Sapena, Antonia. (2020). Research data sharing in Spain:
Exploring determinants, practices, and perceptions. Data, 5(2), 29.
https://doi.org/10.3390/data5020029
Alperín, Juan Pablo; Fischman, Gustavo E. y Willinsky, John. (2008). Open access and
scholarly publishing in Latin America: Ten flavours and a few reflections. Liinc
em Revista, 4(2). https://purl.stanford.edu/kj464qf4719
Alperín, Juan Pablo; Fischman, Gustavo E. y Willinsky, John. Scholarly
communication strategies in Latin America's research-intensive universities.
Educación Superior y Sociedad, 16(2). (2011).
https://doi.org/10.54674/ess.v16i2.659
Alperín, Juan Pablo y Fischman, Gustavo E. (2015). Hecho en Latinoamérica: acceso
abierto, revistas académicas e innovaciones regionales. Clacso.
https://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20150722110704/HechoEnLatinoam
erica.pdf
Alperín, Juan Pablo. (2022). Why I think ending article-processing charges will save
open access. Nature, 610(7931), 233-233. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-
03201-w
Andrews Mancilla, Heather; Teperek, Marta; van Dijck, Jasper; Den Heijer, Kees:
Eggermont, Robbert; Plomp, Esther; Turkyilmaz-van der Velden, Yasemin &
Kurapati, Shalini. (2019). On a quest for cultural change-surveying research
data management practices at Delft University of Technology. LIBER Quarterly:
29(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10287
Andrews Mancilla, Heather. (2023). Programa de Capacitación sobre Gestión de
Datos de Investigación en la Práctica Científica. LA Referencia, Research Data
Alliance, CONARE. https://www.lareferencia.info/es/blogmasonry/
noticias/item/310-programas-de-capacitacion-sobre-datos-deinvestigacion-
2023
Anger, Michael; Wendelborn, Christian; Winkler, Eva C. & Schickhardt,
Christoph. (2022). Neither carrots nor sticks? Challenges surrounding data
sharing from the perspective of research funding agencies. Plos one, 17(9),
e0273259. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273259
Anglada, Lluis & Abadal, Ernest. (2023). Open access: a journey from impossible
to probable, but still uncertain. El profesional de la información, 32(1).
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.ene.13
Arza, Valeria & Fressoli, Mariano. (2017). Systematizing benefits of open science
practices. Information Services & Use, 37(4), 463-474.
https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-170861
Asai, Sumiko. (2021). An analysis of revising article processing charges for open
access journals between 2018 and 2020. Learned Publishing, 34(2), 137–
143. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1334
Asai, Sumiko. (2023). Determinants of article processing charges for hybrid and
gold open access journals. Information Discovery and Delivery, 51(2), 121-
129. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-09-2021-0098
Austin, Claire C.; Bloom, Theodora; Dallmeier-Tiessen, Sünje; Khodiyar, Varsha
K.; Murphy, Fiona; Nurnberger, Amy; Raymond, Lisa; Stackhause; Martina;
Tedds, Jonathan; Vardigan, Mary & Whyte, Angus. (2017). Key components
of data publishing: using current best practices to develop a reference
model for data publishing. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 18, 77-
92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-016-0178-2
Babini, Dominique. (2019). La comunicación científica en América Latina es
abierta, colaborativa y no comercial. Desafí-os para las revistas. Palabra
Clave (La Plata), 8(2), e065. https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e065
Babini, Dominique & Rovelli, L. (2020). Tendencias recientes en las políticas
científicas de ciencia abierta y acceso abierto en Iberoamérica. CLACSOFundación
Carolina.
https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.16667/pr.16667.pdf
Balparda, Laura Rita; del Valle, Héctor; López, Diego Alejandro Germán; Torralba,
María Cecilia; Tazzioli, Florencia; Ciattaglia, Brunela; Vicioso, Benito; Peña,
Hector; Delorenzi, Dardo Javier; Solís, Tania. (2023). Datos de: Huella Urbana de
la Ciudad de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina [Dataset]. RDA
UNR. https://doi.org/10.57715/UNR/EXIVRO
Bangani, Siviwe & Moyo, Mathew. (2019). Data sharing practices among
researchers at South African Universities. Data Science Journal, 18, 28-28.
https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-028
Barba, Lorena A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv
preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.03311
Barnes, Karen I.; Canario, Julio Arturo; Vernekar, Sunil S.; Goudar, Shivaprasad
S.; Espinal, Roberto; Merson, Laura & Cheah, Phaik Yong. (2019). Equitable
data sharing: challenges and suggestions for ways forward. Wellcome Open
Research, 4, 172.
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15425.1
Beagrie, Nell. (2006). Digital curation for science, digital libraries, and
individuals. IJDC. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v1i1.2
Becerril-García, Arianne y Córdoba-González, S. (2021). La infraestructura que
sostiene el acceso abierto no comercial en América Latina, el Caribe, España
y Portugal. Resultados de la encuesta regional a revistas científicas. 2021.
En Conocimiento Abierto en América Latina. Trayectoria y Desafíos. CLACSO.
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11799/112626
Becerril García, Arianne. (2022). Favorecer los canales de publicación y
distribución inclusivos de manera que nunca se excluya a los autores por
motivos económicos: el Acceso Abierto "verde" y "diamante" en América
Latina en el marco de BOAI20. Tramas Y Redes, (3), 327-337.
https://doi.org/10.54871/cl4c315a
Beigel, Fernanda. (2014). Publishing from the periphery: Structural
heterogeneity and segmented circuits. The evaluation of scientific
publications for tenure in Argentina's CONICET. Current sociology, 62(5),
743-765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114533977
Beigel, Fernanda; Gallardo, Oswaldo & Bekerman, Fabiana. (2018). Institutional
expansion and scientific development in the periphery: The structural
heterogeneity of Argentina's academic field. Minerva, 56, 305-331.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9340-2
Besançon, Lonni; Peiffer-Smadja, Nathan; Segalas, Corentin; Jiang, Haiting;
Masuzzo, Paola; Smout, Cooper; Billy, Eric; Deforet, Maxime & Leyrat, Clémence.
(2021). Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC
Medical Research Methodology, 21(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-
021-01304-y
Berghmans, Stephane; Cousijn, Helena; Deakin, Gemma; Meijer, Ingeborg;
Mulligan, Adrian; Plume, Andrew; de Rijcke, Sarah, Rushforth, Alex; Tatum,
Clifford; Van Leeuwen, Thed & Waltman, Ludo. (2017). Open data: The
researcher perspective. Doctoral dissertation.
https://hdl.handle.net/1887/72152
Bezjak, Sonja; Conzett, Philip; Fernandes, Pedro L.; Görögh, Edit; Helbig, Kerstin;
Kramer, Bianca; Labastida, Ignasi; Niemeyer, Kyle; Psomopoulos, Fotis; Ross-
Hellauer, Tony; Schneider, René; Tennant, Jon; Verbakel, Ellen; Clyburne-Sherin,
April; Brinken, Helene & Heller, Lambert. (2017). Manual de capacitación sobre
Ciencia abierta. Foster. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2583101
Berry, Wiliam, D., & Feldman, Stanly. (1985). Multiple regression in practice (No. 50).
Sage. https://archive.org/details/multipleregressi0000berr
Bezuidenhout, Louise. M.; Leonelli, Sabina; Kelly, Ann H., & Rappert, Brian. (2017).
Beyond the digital divide: Towards a situated approach to open data. Science
and Public Policy, 44(4), 464-475. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw036
Bloom, Theodora; Ganley, Emma & Winker, Margaret. (2014). Data access for the
open access literature: PLOS's data policy. PLoS medicine, 11(2), e1001607.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001607
BMJ. (1996). The Nuremberg Code (1947).
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1448
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina y Nakano, Silvia (2011). Acceso abierto en Argentina: la
experiencia de articulación y coordinación institucional de los repositorios
digitales en ciencia y tecnología. E-colabora, 1(2), 163-179.
https://www.academia.edu/download/70461228/Acceso_Abierto_en_Argentin
a_La_experienc20210928-10717-1j6rhhr.pdf
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina; Diana Gómez, Nancy Diana & Miguel, Sandra. (2012).
Opiniones y hábitos de publicación en acceso abierto de los investigadores
argentinos. Un estudio basado en los datos de la encuesta SOAP. Revista
Española de Documentación Científica, 35(3), 453–467.
https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.3.903
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina; Guarnieri, Griselda; Babini, Dominique & López,
Fernando A. (2014). Acceso abierto en la Universidad Nacional de Rosario:
Necesidades y prácticas de los docentes/investigadores. Información, cultura y
sociedad, (30), 13-33. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=263031224002
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina & Martínez-Uribe, L. (2014). Necesidades de gestión de
datos científicos en Argentina. El caso de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario.
En Anais das sessões temáticas e pôsters. Conferência Internacional Acesso
Aberto, Preservação Digital, interoperabilidade, Visibilidade e Dados
Científicos. Biredial Istec 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/108316
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina & Gómez, Nancy Diana. (2015). Conocimientos y
Opiniones sobre acceso abierto en Argentina, México y Brasil. En: Alperín, et al.
Hecho en Latinoamérica: acceso abierto, revistas académicas e innovaciones
regionales. Clacso. http://hdl.handle.net/2133/6386
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina; Miguel, Sandra & Hernández-Pérez, Tony. (2017).
Actitudes y percepciones de los evaluadores de la carrera científica en
Argentina sobre la publicación en acceso abierto. Revista Española de
Documentación Científica, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2017.2.1404
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina & Miguel, Sandra. (2019a). ¿Cuán abierta es la
producción científica de los investigadores argentinos de Ciencias Sociales?
Palabra clave, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e080
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina; Pérez Bigot, Alejandro y Voras, Claudia. (2019b). La
institucionalización del acceso abierto en la Universidad Nacional de Rosario.
En La cultura de los datos: Actas del II Congreso Internacional de la Asociación
Argentina de Humanidades Digitales Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad
de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. http://hdl.handle.net/2133/13572
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina; Díaz Pacífico, F., Ferreyra, S. D. C., & Freán, P. (2020).
Disponibilidad en abierto de la producción científica de la UNR incluida en bases
de datos. El caso de la Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas.
[Comunicación en congreso]. XIV Jornadas de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación.
Universidad Nacional de Rosario. http://hdl.handle.net/2133/19380
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina; Esteva, María; Díaz Pacífico, Fernando; Gutierrez, Ana
Paula; Balparda, Laura Rita; Mestre, Diego; Salazar, Analia y Freán, Paulina.
(2022). Planificación e Implementación del Repositorio de Datos Académicos de
la Universidad Nacional de Rosario (RDA-UNR): una metodología colaborativa e
interdisciplinaria. Conferencia Internacional BIREDIAL-ISTEC. RepHipUNR
http://hdl.handle.net/2133/24576
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina; Salazar, Analia y Freán, Paulina. (2023a).
Implementación de PIDs en América Latina. Repositorio De Datos Académicos
RDA-UNR dataverse.unr.edu.ar. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7860470
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina. (2023b). Capacitación ¿Cómo publicar datos de
investigación en el Repositorio de Datos Académicos RDA-UNR? RepHipUNR
http://hdl.handle.net/2133/26454
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina. (2023c). Capacitación Módulo 2 Traé tus datos. Cómo
publicar Datos de investigación en el Repositorio De Datos Académicos RDAUNR.
RepHipUNR https://rephip.unr.edu.ar/handle/2133/26503
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina. (2023d). Datos de encuesta sobre factores individuales
e institucionales que influyen en la intención de compartir datos de
investigación en la Universidad Nacional de Rosario. RDA UNR.
https://doi.org/10.57715/UNR/HLH331
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina; Salazar, Analia; Freán, Paulina; Díaz Pacífico, Fernando;
Gutiérrez, Ana Paula; Quintana, Dolores; Balparda, Laura Rita; López, Diego;
Stenta, Hernán y Santucci, Natalia. (2023). Trabajo en equipo y compromiso,
claves para la implementación exitosa del Repositorio de Datos Académicos
RDA-UNR. Semana de Ciencia abierta LA Referencia 2023.
https://hdl.handle.net/2133/29041
Borgman, Christine. L. (2012). The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of
the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1059-
1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22634
Borgman, Christine. L. (2016). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the
networked world. MIT press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9963.001.0001
Borgman, Christine. L., Scharnhorst, A., & Golshan, M. S. (2019). Digital data
archives as knowledge infrastructures: Mediating data sharing and reuse.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(8), 888-
904. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24172
Borgman, Christine. L. (2020). Knowledge infrastructures in past, present, and
future tense. eScholarship. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5v73333z
Borgman, Christine. L. & Bourne, P. (2022). Why It Takes a Village to Manage and
Share Data. Harvard Data Science Review, 4(3).
https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.42eec111
Borrego, Ángel. (2022). Indicadores de medición del acceso abierto: fuentes y
herramientas. Anuario ThinkEPI,v. 16. e16a18.
https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16a18
Borrego, Ángel. (2023). Article processing charges for open access journal
publishing: A review. Learned Publishing, 36(3), 359-378.
https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1558
Borycz, Joshua; Olendorf, Robert; Specht, Alison; Grant, Bruce; Crowston, Kevin;
Tenopir, Carol & Sandusky, Robert J. (2023). Perceived benefits of open data are
improving but scientists still lack resources, skills, and rewards. Humanities and
Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-
01831-7
Bosman, Jeroen; Frantsvåg, Jan Erik; Kramer, Bianca ; Langlais, Pierre-Carl &
Proudman, Vanessa. (2021). OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 1: Findings.
Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4558704
Boté-Vericad, Juan José; Carballo-García, Ana; Bautista-Villaescusa, Mónica; Healy,
Sharon. (2023). Research data repositories in the RDM cycle: challenges and
strengths for curators/data stewards. AIBstudi 63(3).
https://doi.org/10.2426/aibstudi-13892
Brainard, Jeffrey. (2021). Open access takes flight. Science.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.371.6524.16
Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology.
Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235356393_Using_thematic_analysi
s_in_psychology
Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria. (2012). Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of
research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative,
qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. (pp. 57-71). American
Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Braun, V. & Clarke, Victoria. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide
for beginners. Successful qualitative research. Sage.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256089360_Successful_Qualitative_
Research_A_Practical_Guide_for_Beginners
Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for
thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3.
https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
Brinken, Helene; Kuchma, Iryna; Kalaitzi, Vasso; Davidson, Joy; Pontika, Nancy;
Cancellieri, Matteo; Melero, Remedios; Kastelic, Danjama Borba, Filomena;
Lenaki, Katerina; Toelch, Ulf; Zourou, Katerina; Konth, Petr, Schmidt, Birgit &
Rodrigues, Eloy. (2019). A Case Report: Building communities with training and
resources for Open Science trainers. LIBER Quarterly, 29(1).
https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10303
Budapest Open Access Initiative. Recomendaciones en su 20º Aniversario (2022).
https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai20/boai20-spanishtranslation/
Camkin, Jeff; Neto, Susana; Bhattarai, Basundgara; Ojha, Hermant; Khan, Shazbaz;
Sugiura, Ai; Lin, Jiaying; Nurritasari, Fitrie Atviana & Karanja, Joseph Muirui.
(2022). Open Science for Accelerating the Sustainable Development Goals:
Status and Prospects in Asia and the Pacific. Frontiers in Political Science, 4,
878761. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.878761
Candela, Leonardo; Castelli, Donatella; Manghi, Pablo & Tani, Alice. (2015). Data
journals: A survey. Journal of the Association for Information Science and
Technology, 66(9), 1747-1762. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23358
Castro, Eleni; Crosas, Mercé; Garnett, Alex; Sheridan, Kasey & Altman, Micah. (2017).
Evaluating and promoting open data practices in open access journals. Journal
of Scholarly Publishing, 49(1), 66-88. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.49.1.66
Carroll, John B. (1953). An analytical solution for approximating simple structure in
factor analysis. Psychometrika, 18(1), 23-38.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289025
Cerda¿Cosme, Roxana, & Méndez, Eva. (2023). Analysis of shared research data in
Spanish scientific papers about COVID¿19: A first approach. Journal of the
Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(4), 402-414.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24716
Champieux, Robin; Solomonides, Anthony; Conte, Marisa; Rojevsky, Svetlana;,
Phuong, Jimmy; Dorr, David A.; Zampino, Elizabeth; Wilson, Adam; Carson,
Matthew B. & Holmes, Kristi. (2023). Ten simple rules for organizations to
support research data sharing. PLOS Computational Biology, 19(6), e1011136.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011136
Choudhury Sayeed; Huang Calhong & Palmer Carole L. (2020). Updating the DCC
curation lifecycle model. International Journal of Digital Curation 15(1): 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.721
Chawinga, Winner Dominic & Zinn, Sandy. (2019). Global perspectives of research
data sharing: A systematic literature review. Library & Information Science
Research, 41(2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.04.004
Clare, Connie; Cruz, María; Papadopoulou, Elli; Savage, James; Teperek, Marta &
Wang, Yang. (2019). Engaging researchers with data management: The
cookbook. Open Book Publishers.
https://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0185
Clinio, Anne. (2019). Ciência aberta na América Latina: duas perspectivas em
disputa. Transinformação, 31, e190028.
https://doi.org/10.1590/238180889201931e190028
cOAlition S. (2018). Plan S. https://www.coalition-s.org/why-plan-s/
Cohen, Jacob; Cohen, Patricia; West, Stephen G. & Aiken, Leona S. (2002). Applied
Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441
Colavizza, Giovanni; Hrynaszkiewicz, Iain; Staden, Isla; Whitaker, Kirstie, &
McGillivray, Barbara. (2020). The citation advantage of linking publications to
research data. PloS one, 15(4), e0230416.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230416
Cole, Nicki Lisa; Reichmann, Stefan & Ross-Hellauer, Tony. (2023). Toward equitable
open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research
institutions, funders and researchers. Royal Society Open Science, 10(2),
221460. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221460
Cooper, Alexandra; Steeleworthy, Michael; Paquette-Bigras, Ève; Clary, Erin;
MacPherson, Erin; Gillis, Louise & Brodeur, Jason. (2021). Creating Guidance for
Canadian Dataverse Curators: Portage Network’s Dataverse Curation
Guide. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 10(3).
https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2021.1201
Conzett, Philip. (2020). DataverseNO: A national, generic repository and its
contribution to the increased FAIRness of data from the long tail of research.
Ravnetrykk https://doi.org/10.7557/15.5514
Conzett, Philip. (2023). DataverseNO README File Template - General (2.3). Zenodo.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828073
Comité Asesor en Ciencia abierta y Ciudadana. MINCYT, Argentina, Ministerio de
Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Argentina (2022). Diagnóstico y
lineamientos para una política de ciencia abierta en Argentina.
https://bicyt.conicet.gov.ar/fichas/produccion/12291633
Cragin, M. H., Palmer, C. L., Carlson, J. R., & Witt, M. (2010). Data sharing, small
science and institutional repositories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1926), 4023-
4038. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0165
Crosas, Mercè. (2011). The Dataverse Network®: An Open-Source Application for
Sharing, Discovering and Preserving Data. D-Lib Magazine, 17(1/2).
https://doi.org/10.1045/january2011-crosas
Crosas, Mercè. (2020). Fair Principles and Beyond: Implementation in Dataverse.
Septentrio Conference Series, 2, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7557/5.5334
CRUE Universidades Españolas (2023). La Coalición para el Avance de la Evaluación
de la Investigación (CoARA) aprueba la propuesta de reforma de Crue, ANECA
y CSIC para España. https://www.crue.org/2023/07/coara-aprueba-lapropuesta-
de-reforma-de-crue-aneca-y-csic-para-espana/
Cuartas, Gabriel Vélez; Beigel, Fernanda; Quintero, Diego Restrepo; Uribe Tirado,
Alejandro; Gutiérrez Gutiérrez, Gerardo; Pallares, César; Soto Herrera, Diego
Alejandro & Gallardo, Osvaldo. (2022). La producción argentina en acceso
abierto y pagos de APC. CONICET. https://www.conicet.gov.ar/wpcontent/
uploads/INFORME-CONICET-Argentina-Publicaciones-y-Pagos-de-
APC-REVISADO-2023.pdf
Curty, Renato Gonçalves; Crowston, Kevin; Specht, Alison; Grant, B. W. & Dalton,
Elizabeth D. (2017). Attitudes and norms affecting scientists’ data reuse. PloS
one, 12(12), e0189288. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189288
Cushing, Amber L. & Shankar, Kalpana. (2019). Digital curation on a small Island: a
study of professional education and training needs in Ireland. Archives and
Records, 40(2), 146-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2018.1425135
da Costa, Michelli Pereira & Lima Leite, Fernando César (2019). Factors influencing
research data communication on Zika virus: a grounded theory. Journal of
Documentation, 75(5), 910-926. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2018-0071
Dallmeier-Tiessen, Suenje; Darby, Robert; Goerner, Bettina; Hyppoelae, Jenni; Igo-
Kemenes, Peter; Kahn, Deborah; Lambert, Simon; Legenfelder, Anja; Leonard,
Chris; Mele, Salvarore; Nowicka, Malgorzata; Polydarotou, Panayiota; Ross,
David; Ruiz-Pérez, Sergio; Schimmer, Ralf; Swaisland, Mark & Van Der Stelt,
Wim. (2011). Highlights from the SOAP project survey. What scientists think
about open access publishing. arXiv preprint.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1101.5260
Data Curation Network. (2022). Data Curation Network Strategic Framework 2022-
2025 v1.0. University of Minnesota Twin Cities.
https://hdl.handle.net/11299/226182
David, Romain; Mabile, Laurence; Specht, Alison; Stryeck, Sarah; Thomsen, Mogens;
Yahia, Mohamed; Jonquet, Clement; Dollé, Laurent; Jacob, Daniel; Bailo,
Daniele; Bravo, Elena; Gachet, Sophie; Gunderman, Hannah; Hollebecq, Jean
Eudes & Ioannidis, Vassilios. (2020). FAIRness literacy: the Achilles’ heel of
applying FAIR principles. CODATA Data Science Journal, 19(32), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-032
Malo de Molina, Teresa (2019). E-cienciaDatos, el repositorio de datos de
investigación del consorcio madroño. RUIDERAe: Revista de Unidades de
Información. https://revista.uclm.es/index.php/ruiderae/article/view/2170
de Oliveira Carvalho, Teila. (2016). A influência das revistas científicas de acesso
aberto para o depósito e publicação dos dados de pesquisa. Cadernos de
Biblioteconomia, Arquivística e Documentação, 2.
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/66626
Debat, Humberto & Babini, Dominique. (2019). Plan S in Latin America: A
precautionary note. PeerJ Preprints, 7, e27834v2.
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27834v2
Declaración de Budapest (2001). http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml
Declaración de Bethesda (2003).
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm
Declaración de Berlín (2003). http://openaccess.mpg.de/67627/Berlin_sp.pdf
Declaración de Panamá sobre Ciencia abierta (2018).
https://forocilac.org/declaracion-de-panama-sobre-ciencia-abierta/
Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio; Ràfols, Ismael y Abadal, Ernest. (2021). Letter: A call
for a radical change in research evaluation in Spain. El Profesional de La
información, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.may.09
Demchenko, Yuri; Stoy, Lennart; Engelhardt, Claudia & Gaillard, Vinciane. (2021).
D7. 3 FAIR Competence Framework for Higher Education (Data Stewardship
Professional Competence Framework).
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5361917
Devaraju, Anusuriya; Huber, Robert; Mokrane, Mustapha; Herterich, Patricia;
Cepinskas, Linas; de Vries, Jerry; L'Hours, Herve; Davidson, Joy & Angus White.
(2020). FAIRsFAIR Data Object Assessment Metrics (0.4).
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4081213
DiMaggio, Paul J., & Powell, Walter W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional
isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American
sociological review, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Directrices para proveedores de contenido del Sistema Nacional de Repositorios
Digitales. (2015). Buenos Aires: SNRD. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e
Innovación Productiva.
https://repositoriosdigitales.mincyt.gob.ar/files/Directrices_SNRD_2015.pdf
Doldirina, Catherine; Eisenstadt, Anita; Onsrud, Harland & Uhlir, Paul. (2018). Legal
approaches for open access to research data. LawArXiv Papers, Santa Barbara,
1-52. https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/n7gfa
Dorta-González, Pablo; González-Betancor, Sara M. & Dorta-González, María Isabel
(2021). To what extent is researchers' data-sharing motivated by formal
mechanisms of recognition and credit? Scientometrics, 126(3), 2209-2225.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03869-3
Esteva, María. (2017). Material didáctico del módulo 1. Seminario “Curación de
colecciones de datos de investigación”. Especialización en Gestión de
Información Científica y Tecnológica. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad
de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. [Video].
https://youtu.be/oNnD89LEUfw?si=gJKwZQo-8lGCuaJa
Esteva, María; Jansen, Craig; Arduino, Pedro; Sharifi-Mood, Mahyar; Dawson, Clint
N. & Balandrano-Coronel, Josue. (2019). Curation and publication of simulation
data in DesignSafe, a natural hazard engineering open platform and repository.
Publications, 7(3), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030051
Esteva, María. (2020). Por qué y para qué. Desafíos y beneficios de la gestión de
datos abiertos de investigación. Capacitación Gestión de datos de investigación
en la UNR https://rephip.unr.edu.ar/server/api/core/bitstreams/4c14ee72-
9453-4634-8d67-2229b444706c/content
Edwards, Paul N. (2010). A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the
politics of global warming. MIT Press.
Edwards, Paul N.; Jackson, Steven J.; Chalmers, Melissa K.; Bowker, Geoffrey C.;
Borgman, Christine L.; Ribes, David; Burton, Matt & Calvert, Scout. (2013).
Knowledge Infrastructures: Intellectual Frameworks and Research
Challenges. Ann Arbor: Deep Blue. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/97552
Engelhardt, Claudia; Biernacka, Katarzyna; Coffey, Aoife; Cornet, Ronald; Danciu,
Alina; Demchenko, Yuri; Downes, Stephen; Erdmann, Christopher; Garbuglia,
Federica; Germer, Kerstin; Helbig, Kerstin; Hellström, Margareta; Hettne,
Kristina; Hibbert, Dawn; Jetten, Mijke; Karimova, Yulia; Kryger Hansen, Karsten;
Kuusniemi, Mari Elisa; Letizia, Viviana; McCutcheon, Valerie; McGillivray,
Barbara; Ostrop, Jenny; Petersen, Britta; Petrus, Ana; Reichmann, Stefan;
Rettberg, Najla; Reverté, Carmen; Rochlin, Nick; Saenen, Bregt; Schmidt, Birgit;
Scholten, Jolien; Shanahan, Hugh; Straube, Armin; Van den Eynden, Veerle;
Vandendorpe, Justine; Venkataram, Shanmugasundaram; Wiljes, Cord; Wuttke,
Ulrike; Yeomans, Joanne & Zhou, Biru. (2022). How to be FAIR with your data: A
teaching and training handbook for higher education institutions.
Universitätsverlag Göttingen. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6674301
Enke, Neelo; Thessen, Anne; Bach, Kerstin; Bendix, Jörg; Seeger, Bernhard &
Gemeinholzer, Birgit. (2012). The user's view on biodiversity data sharing—
Investigating facts of acceptance and requirements to realize a sustainable use
of research data—. Ecological informatics, 11, 25-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.03.004
Enwald, Heidi; Grigas, Vincas; Rud¿ionien¿, Jurgita & Kortelainen, Terttu. (2022).
Data sharing practices in open access mode: a study of the willingness to share
data in different disciplines. Information Research, 27(2).
https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper932
European Commission (2017). Evaluation of research careers fully acknowledging
open science practices. Rewards, incentives and/or recognition for researchers
practicing Open Science. European Commission. Directorate General for
Research & Innovation. https://doi.org/10.2777/75255
European Commission (2021). Horizonte Europa https://research-andinnovation.
ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/fundingprogrammes-
and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en
Everitt, Brian S. y Wykes, Till. (2001). Diccionario de Estadística para Psicólogos.
Barcelona: Ariel.
Faniel, Ixchel M.; Barrera-Gomez, Julianna; Kriesberg, Adam & Yakel, Elizabeth.
(2013). A Comparative Study of Data Reuse Among Quantitative Social Scientists
and Archeologists. IConference, 797–800. https://doi.org/10.9776/13391
Federer, Lisa. (2018). Defining data librarianship: a survey of competencies, skills,
and training. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(3), 294.
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.306
Federer, Lisa M., Belter, Christopher W.; Joubert, Douglas J.; Livinski, Alicia; Yan-Ling,
Lu; Snyders, Lyssa N & Thompson, Holly. (2018). Data sharing in PLOS ONE: an
analysis of data availability statements. PloS one, 13(5), e0194768.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194768
Federer, Lisa M. (2022). Long-term availability of data associated with articles in
PLOS ONE. Plos one, 17(8), e0272845.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272845
Fecher, Benedict; Friesike, Sascha, & Hebing, Marcel. (2015). What drives academic
data sharing? PloS one, 10(2), e0118053.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118053
Fecher, Benedict; Friesike, Sascha; Hebing, Marcel, & Linek, Stephanie. (2017). A
reputation economy: how individual reward considerations trump systemic
arguments for open access to data. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.51
Force11. (2020). Guiding Principles for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-
Usable Data Publishing Version B1.0. https://force11.org/info/guidingprinciples-
for-findable-accessible-interoperable-and-re-usable-datapublishing-
version-b1-0/
Fushimi, Marcela. (2018). Desarrollo de repositorios digitales institucionales en las
universidades nacionales en Argentina, período 2004-2015. [Tesis de Maestría].
Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
http://ridaa.unq.edu.ar/handle/20.500.11807/887
Fushimi, Marcela; Pené, Mónica G.; Unzurrunzaga, Carolina y Sanllorenti, Ana.
(2021). Situación de los repositorios digitales en las universidades nacionales
argentinas de gestión pública (2019). Universidad Nacional de La Plata. IIHCS.
http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/libros/pm.4722/pm.4722.pdf
García-García, Alicia; López-Borrull, Alexandre & Peset, Fernanda. (2015). Data
journals: eclosión de nuevas revistas especializadas en datos. El profesional de
la información, 24(6), 1699-2407. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.nov.17
Gefen, David; Straub, Detmar & Boudreau, Marie Claude. (2000). Structural
equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research
practice. Communications of the association for information systems, 4(1), 7.
https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
Gerwig, Katherine J. (2017). Current Outreach and Marketing Practices for Research
Data Repositories. In L. Johnston, Curating Research Data, Volume 1: Practical
Strategies for Your Digital Repository. Chicago: Association of College and
Research Libraries.
https://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/booksan
ddigitalresources/digital/9780838988596_crd_v1_OA.pdf#page=222
Gómez, Nancy y Bongiovani, Paola Carolina. (2012). Open access and A2K:
Collaborative experiences in Latin America. En Lau, Jesús; Tammaro, Anna
Maria & Bothma, Theo J.D. Libraries driving access to knowledge (Vol. 151).
https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/rest/api/core/bitstreams/10c4b477-b6b5-4268-
a8d9-705f44a8f547/content
González-Teruel, Aurora; López-Borrull, Alexandre; Santos-Hermosa, Gema;
Abad-García, Francisca; Ollé, Candela & Serrano-Vicente, Rocío. (2022). Drivers
and barriers in the transition to open science: the perspective of stakeholders
in the Spanish scientific community. El Profesional de la información, 31(3).
https://hdl.handle.net/10609/145540
Goode, Gregory; Hahnel, Mark; Zhou, Yuanchun; Jiang, Lulu;
Chandramouliswaran, Iswar;, Hafez, Amy; Paine, Taunton; Gregurickm Susan;
Simango, Samuel; Palma Peña, Juan Miguel; Murray, Holly; Cannon, Matt;
Grant, Rebecca; McKellar, Kate & Day, Laura. (2022). The State of Open Data
2022. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21276984.v5
Gownaris, Natasha J.; Vermeir, Koen; Bittner, Martin Inmanuel; Gunawardena, L.,
Kaur-Ghumaan, S., Lepenies, R., ... & Zakari, I. S. (2022). Barriers to Full
Participation in the Open Science Life Cycle among Early Career Researchers.
Data Science Journal, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2022-002
Grabus, Sam & Greenberg, Jane. (2019). The landscape of rights and licensing
initiatives for data sharing. Data Science Journal, 18, 29-29.
https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-029
Gregory, Kathleen; Groth, Paul; Scharnhorst, Andrea & Wyatt, Sally. (2020). Lost or
Found? Discovering Data Needed for Research. Harvard Data Science Review,
2(2). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.e38165eb
Hair, Joseph F.; Black, William C.; Babin, Barry J. & Anderson, Rolph E. (2019).
Multivariate data analysis, Eighth Edition. Cengage Learning EMEA
Hardwicke, Tom E.; Mathur, Maya B.; MacDonald, Kyle; Nilsonne, Gustav; Banks,
George C.; Kidwell, Mallory C.; Mohr, Alice Hofelich; Clayton, Elizabeth; Yoon,
Erika J.; Tessler, Michael Henry; Lenne, Richie L.; Altman, Sara; Long, Bria &
Frank, Michael C. (2018). Data availability, reusability, and analytic
reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the
journal Cognition. R Soc Open Sci., 15;5(8):180448.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180448
Harper, Lindsey M., & Kim, Youngseek. (2018). Attitudinal, normative, and resource
factors affecting psychologists’ intentions to adopt an open data badge: An
empirical analysis. International journal of information management, 41, 23-32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.03.001
Harvard University. The Institute of Quantitative Social Science. (2022). Guía de Uso
Proyecto Dataverse. http://hdl.handle.net/2133/23695
Harvey, Ross. (2010). Digital curation: a how-to-do-it manual. New York: Neal.
https://archive.org/details/digitalcurationh0000harv
Haustein, Stefanie; Schares, Eric; Alperín, Juan Pablo; Hare, Madelaine; Butler, Leig-
Ann & Schönfelder, Nina. (2024). Estimating global article processing charges
paid to six publishers for open access between 2019 and 2023. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2407.16551. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.16551
Hernández-Pérez, Tony & García-Moreno, María Antonia. (2013). Datos abiertos y
repositorios de datos: nuevo reto para los bibliotecarios. Profesional de la
información, 22(3), 259-263. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2013.may.10
Hernández Sampieri, Roberto; Fernández Collado, Carlos & Baptista Lucio, Pilar.
(2010). Metodología de la investigación. Mc Graw Hill educación.
https://www.uv.mx/personal/cbustamante/files/2011/06/metodologia-de-lainvestigaci%
C3%83%C2%B3n_sampieri.pdf
Heesen, Remco. (2017). Communism and the Incentive to Share in Science.
Philosophy of Science, 84(4), 698-716. https://doi.org/10.1086/693875
Higgins, Sarah. (2008). Draft DCC curation lifecycle model. International Journal of
Digital Curation, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v2i2.30
Hicks, Diana; Wouters, Paul; Waltman, Ludo; De Rijcke, Sarah & Rafols, Ismael.
(2015). Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature,
520(7548), 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
Hillyer, Rebecca; Posada, Alejandro; Albornoz, Denisse; Chan, Leslie & Okune,
Angela. (2017). Framing a situated and inclusive open science: emerging
lessons from the open and collaborative science in development network.
In Expanding perspectives on open science: Communities, cultures and
diversity in concepts and practices (pp. 18-33). IOS Press.
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2dj1h8nh
Hodonu-Wusu, James Oluwaseyi; Noorhidawati, A. & Abrizah, A. (2020). Malaysian
researchers on open data: the first national survey on awareness, practices and
attitudes. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 25(2), 1-20.
https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol25no2.1
Hofmann, Bjern. (2022). Open science knowledge production: Addressing
epistemological challenges and ethical implications. Publications, 10(3), 24.
https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10030024
Hong Kong principles for assessing researchers. World Conference on Research
Integrity. (2019). https://www.wcrif.org/guidance/hong-kong-principles
Hosseini, Mohammad; Senabre Hidalgo, Eric; Horbach, Serge P. J. M.; Güttinger,
Stepahn & Penders, Bart. (2022). Messing with Merton: The intersection
between open science practices and Mertonian values. Accountability in
Research, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2141625
Houtkoop, Bobbie Lee; Chambers, Chris; Macleod, Malcon; Bishop, Dorothy V. M.;
Nichols, Thomas E. & Wagenmakers, Erik Jan. (2018). Data sharing in
psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in methods and
practices in psychological science, 1(1), 70-85.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886
Howell, George F. & Buck, Jeffrey M. (2012). The adult student and course
satisfaction: what matters most? Innovative higher education, 37, 215-226
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9201-0
Hrynaszkiewicz, Iain; Simons, Natasha; Hussain, Azhar; Grant, Rebecca, & Goudie,
Simon. (2020). Developing a research data policy framework for all journals and
publishers. Data Science Journal, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-005
Huijpen, Kim & Aspaas, Per Pippin. (2021). Recognition & Rewards in the
Netherlands. Open Science Talk, (38). https://doi.org/10.7557/19.6326
Ibarzabal, Juan Ignacio; Lagrutta, Mariana; Pendino, Juan Carlos; Parodi, Roberto
Leandro. (2022). Dataset Relación entre el Aumento de la Amplitud de
Distribución del Diámetro Eritrocitario (Red Cell Distribution Width o RDW) y la
morbimortalidad postquirúrgica. [Dataset].
https://doi.org/10.57715/UNR/OJ4BUD
Indart, Camila; Ríos Hilario, Ana Belén & Rodríguez Bravo, Blanca. (2021).
Relevamiento de repositorios y portales de datos abiertos de investigación en
la Argentina. Información, cultura y sociedad, (45), 59-74.
https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i45.10421
Jetten, M., Grootveld, M., Mordant, A., Jansen, M., Bloemers, M., Miedema, M., & van
Gelder, C. W. (2021). Professionalising data stewardship in the Netherlands.
Competences, training and education. Dutch roadmap towards national
implementation of FAIR data stewardship. National Programme Open Science
(NPOS).
Johnson, Rob, Parsons, Tom & Chiarelli, Andrea. (2016). Jisc Data Asset Framework
Toolkit 2016. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.177876.
Johnston, Lisa R. (2017). Introduction to Data Curation. Curating Research Data.
Volume One: Practical Strategies for Your Digital Repository. ACRL.
https://www.ala.org/sites/default/files/acrl/content/publications/booksanddigi
talresources/digital/9780838988596_crd_v1_OA.pdf
Johnston, Lisa R.; Carlson, Jake; Hudson-Vitale, Cynthia; Imker, Heidi; Kozlowski,
Wendy; Olendorf, Robert; Stewart, Claire; Blake, Mara; Herndon, Joef; McGeary,
Timothy M. & Hull, Elizabeth. (2018). Data curation network: A crossinstitutional
staffing model for curating research data. IJDC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v13i1.616
Joo, Soohyung & Peters, Christie. (2020). User needs assessment for research data
services in a research university. Journal of Librarianship and Information
Science, 52(3), 633-646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000619856073

Joo, Yeon Kyoung & Kim, Youngseek. (2017). Engineering researchers’ data reuse
behaviours: a structural equation modelling approach. The Electronic Library.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-08-2016-0163
Joo, Soohyung, Kim, Sujin & Kim, Youngseek. (2017). An exploratory study of health
scientists’ data reuse behaviors: Examining attitudinal, social, and resource
factors. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(4), 389-407.
https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2016-0201
Khan, Nushrat; Thelwall, Mike & Kousha, Kayvan. (2023). Data sharing and reuse
practices: disciplinary differences and improvements needed. Online
Information Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2021-0423
Kim, Youngseek. (2013). Institutional and Individual Influences on Scientists' Data
Sharing Behaviors. [Dissertation]. Syracuse University.
https://surface.syr.edu/it_etd/85
Kim, Youngseek, & Zhang, Ping. (2015). Understanding data sharing behaviors of
STEM researchers: The roles of attitudes, norms, and data repositories. Library
& Information Science Research, 37(3), 189-200.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2015.04.006
Kim, Youngseek, & Kim, Sujin. (2015). Institutional, Motivational, and Resource
Factors Influencing Health Scientists' Data-Sharing Behaviours. Journal of
Scholarly Publishing, 46(4), 366-389. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.46.4.05
Kim, Youngseek & Burns, C. Sean. (2016). Norms of data sharing in biological
sciences: The roles of metadata, data repository, and journal and funding
requirements. Journal of Information Science, 42(2), 230-245.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515592098
Kim, Youngseek & Stanton, Jeffrey M. (2016). Institutional and individual factors
affecting scientists' data¿sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis. Journal of the
Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 776-799.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23424
Kim, Youngseek. (2017). Scientists' data reuse behaviors: A multilevel
analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and
Technology, 68(12), 2709-2719. http://doi.org/10.3886/E100404V1
Kim, Youngseek. (2017). Fostering scientists’ data sharing behaviors via data
repositories, journal supplements, and personal communication methods.
Information Processing & Management, 53(4), 871-885.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.03.003
Kim, Jeonghyun; Schuler, Eric R. & Pechenina, Anna. (2018). Predictors of data
sharing and reuse behavior in academic communities. In Knowledge Discovery
and Data Design Innovation: Proceedings of the International Conference on
Knowledge Management (ICKM 2017) (pp. 1-25).
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813234482_0001
Kim, Youngseek & Nah, Seunghan. (2018). Internet researchers’ data sharing
behaviors: An integration of data reuse experience, attitudinal beliefs, social
norms, and resource factors. Online information review, 42(1), 124-142.
https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2016-0313
Kim, Youngseek & Oh, Jong Sir. (2018). Disciplinary, institutional, and individual
factors affecting researchers' depositing articles in institutional repository: An
empirical analysis. The journal of academic librarianship, 44(6), 824-832.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.09.013
Kim, Youngseek. (2021). A study of the roles of metadata standard and data
repository in science, technology, engineering and mathematics researchers'
data reuse. Online Information Review, 45(7), 1306-1321.
https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2020-0431
Kim, Youngseek & Oh, Jong Sir. (2021). Researchers’ article sharing through
institutional repositories and ResearchGate: A comparison study. Journal of
Librarianship and Information Science, 53(3), 475-487.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000620962840
Kim, Youngseek. (2022). Data sharing by biologists: A comparative study of genome
sequence data and lab experiment data. Library & Information Science
Research, 44(1), 101139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101139
Kindling, Maxi; Pampel, Heiz; van de Sandt, Stepahnie; Rücknagel, Jessika; Vierkant,
Paul; Kloska, Gabriele; Witt, Michael; Schirmbacher, Peter; Bertelmann, Roland
& Scholze, Frank. (2017). The Landscape of Research Data Repositories in 2015:
A re3data Analysis. D-Lib Magazine, 23(3/4).
https://doi.org/10.1045/march2017-kindling
Klebel, Thomas & Ross-Hellauer, Tony. (2023). The APC-barrier and its effect on
stratification in open access publishing. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(1), 22-
43. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00245
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. (1991). Merton's Sociology of Science: The First and the Last
Sociology of Science? Contemporary Sociology, 20(4), 522-526.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2071782
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. (2005). La fabricación del conocimiento. Un ensayo sobre el
carácter constructivista y contextual de la ciencia. Buenos Aires: Universidad
Nacional de Quilmes Editorial.
https://ridaa.unq.edu.ar/handle/20.500.11807/595
Kratz, John E. & Strasser, Carly. (2015). Making data count. Scientific data, 2(1), 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.39
Larivière, Vincent; Haustein, Stefanie & Mongeon, Philippe. (2015). The oligopoly of
academic publishers in the digital era. PloS one, 10(6), e0127502.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
Latour, Bruno. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers
through society. Harvard university press.
Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics. (2015). http://www.leidenmanifesto.org
Leonelli, Sabina. (2015). What counts as scientific data? A relational framework.
Philosophy of Science, 82(5), 810-821. https://doi.org/10.1086/684083
Leonelli, Sabina & Lewandowsky, S. (2022). The Reproducibility of Research In
Flanders: Fact Finding And Recommendations. KVAB Thinkers’ Report 2022.
https://kvab.be/sites/default/rest/blobs/3679/tw_reproducability.pdf
Leonelli, Sabina. (2023). Philosophy of Open Science (Elements in the Philosophy of
Science). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009416368
Lattuada, Mario José y Giba, Gabriela Silvia. (2014). Una introducción a la Ley de
Repositorios Abiertos para Ciencia y Tecnología. Debate Universitario CAEEUAI,
2(4), 79-99. http://www2.biblio.unlp.edu.ar/jubiuna/capacitacion/tallersobre-
politicas-de-acceso-al-conocimiento-cientifico-en-las-uunn/4588-24144-
1-PB-2.pdf
Lee, Dong Joon & Stvilia, Besiki. (2017). Practices of research data curation in
institutional repositories: A qualitative view from repository staff. PloS one,
12(3), e0173987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173987
Ley 26.899 (2013). Creación de Repositorios Digitales Institucionales de Acceso
Abierto, Propios o Compartidos.
https://repositoriosdigitales.mincyt.gob.ar/files/Boletin_Oficial_Ley_26899.pdf.
Reglamento de la Ley 26.899 (2016).
https://repositoriosdigitales.mincyt.gob.ar/files/Boletin_Oficial_Resolucion_75
3.pdf
Lin, Dawei; Crabtree, Jonathan; Dillo, Ingrid; Downs, Robert R.; Edmunds, Rorie;
Giaretta, David; De Giusti, Marisa; L’Hours, Hervé; Hugo, Wim; Jenkyns, Reyna;
Khodiyar, Varsha; Martone, Maryann E.; Mokrane, Mustapha; Navale, Vivek;
Petters, Jonathan; Sierman, Barbara; Sokolova, Dina V.; Stockhause, Martina &
Westbrook, John. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific
Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
Lord, Philip & Macdonald, Alison. (2003). e-Science curation report. Data curation
for e-Science in the UK: an audit to establish requirements for future curation
and provision. https://digitalpreservation.gov/news/2004/e-
ScienceReportFinal.pdf
Lynch, Clifford A. (2003). Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for
scholarship in the digital age. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 327-336.
https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0039
Mason, Claire M.; Box, Paul J. & Burns, Shanae. M. (2020). Research data sharing in
the Australian national science agency: Understanding the relative importance
of organisational, disciplinary and domain-specific influences. Plos one, 15(8),
e0238071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238071
Majid, Shaheen; Foo, Schubert & Zhang, Xue. (2018). Research data management
by academics and researchers: Perceptions, knowledge and practices. In
Maturity and Innovation in Digital Libraries: 20th International Conference on
Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2018, Hamilton, New Zealand, November
19-22, 2018, Proceedings 20 (pp. 166-178). Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04257-8_16
Maruši¿, Ana; Bošnjak, Lana & Jeron¿i¿, Ana. (2011). A systematic review of research
on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines.
Plos one, 6(9), e23477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023477
Mannheimer, Sara; Pienta, Amy; Kirilova, Dessilava; Elman, Colin & Wutich, Amber.
(2019). Qualitative data sharing: Data repositories and academic libraries as key
partners in addressing challenges. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(5), 643-
664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218784991
Mannheimer, Sara. (2022). Data curation for qualitative data reuse and big social
research: Connecting communities of practice. Humboldt Universitaet zu Berlin
(Germany). https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2021.1218
Melero, Remedios & Navarro¿Molina, Carolina. (2020). Researchers' attitudes and
perceptions towards data sharing and data reuse in the field of food science
and technology. Learned Publishing, 33(2), 163-179.
https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1287
Méndez Rodríguez, Eva. (2021). Open Science por defecto: La nueva normalidad
para la investigación. Arbor: Ciencia, pensamiento y cultura, 197(799), 2.
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2021.799002
Méndez Rodríguez, Eva & Sánchez-Núñez, Pablo. (2023). Navigating the Future and
Overcoming Challenges to Unlock Open Science. In Ethics and Responsible
Research and Innovation in Practice: The ETHNA System Project (pp. 203-223).
Cham: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33177-0_13
Merton, Robert K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical
investigations. University of Chicago press.
Miguel, Sandara, & de Moya Anegón, Félix. (2009). La ciencia argentina bajo la lupa
de los indicadores cienciométricos: una mirada crítica de la realidad científica
argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Plata.
https://memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/library?a=d&c=libros&d=Jpm1553
Miguel, Sandra; Gómez, Nancy-Diana & Bongiovani, Paola Carolina. (2012). Acceso
abierto real y potencial a la produccion cientifica de un pais. El caso argentino.
El Profesional de la Informacion, 21(2), 146-154.
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.mar.04
Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. (2022). Diagnóstico y herramientas
para la Política de Ciencia abierta en Argentina.
https://back.argentina.gob.ar/ciencia/comite-ciencia-abierta/diagnostico-ylineamientos?
Mirowski, Philip. (2018). The future (s) of open science. Social studies of science,
48(2), 171-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718772086
Mitroff, Ian I. (1974). Norms and counter-norms in a select group of the Apollo
moon scientists: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists. American
sociological review, 579-595. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094423
Mons, Barend. (2018). Data stewardship for open science: Implementing FAIR
principles. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315380711
Nash, Jack. (2021) ‘I ain’t afraid of no myth’ – busting the myths on data sharing.
Wellcome Open Research.
https://blog.wellcomeopenresearch.org/2020/08/20/i-aint-afraid-of-no-mythbusting-
the-myths-on-data-sharing/
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and
Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical Principles and
Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research.
https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html
National Institutes of Health. (2020). Final NIH Policy for Data Management and
Sharing (NOT-OD-21-013). https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/noticefiles/
NOT-OD-21-013.html
Navarro-Molina, Caroñina & Melero, Remedios. (2019). Motivación, barreras e
incentivos para la compartición y reutilización de los datos de investigación.
Visión de los investigadores. El profesional de la información, 28(5).
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.sep.16
Nelson, Alondra. (2022). Ensuring Free, Immediate, and Equitable Access to
Federally Funded Research. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive
Departments and Agencies. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President
Office of Science and Technology Policy. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wpcontent/
uploads/2022/08/08-2022-OSTP-Public-access-Memo.pdf
Neylon, Cameron. (2017). Compliance Culture or Culture Change? The role of
funders in improving data management and sharing practice amongst
researchers. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 3, e21705.
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21705
Nunnally, Jum C. & Bernstein, Ira H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York. NY:
McGraw-Hill.
OCSDNet Red de Ciencia abierta y Colaborativa para el Desarrollo. (2017).
Manifiesto de Ciencia abierta y Colaborativa: Hacia una ciencia abierta inclusiva
por el bienestar social y ambiental. https://ocsdnet.org/wpcontent/
uploads/2015/04/Manifesto-Infographic-Spanish-1.pdf
OECD (2007). Principles and guidelines for access to research data from public
funding. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-principles-andguidelines-
for-access-to-research-data-from-public-funding_9789264034020-
en-fr.html
ODI (2017). Open data essentials. https://open-data-essentials.learndata.info/
Oo, Chery Zin.; Chew, Adrian W.; Wong, Adeline L. H.; Gladding, Joanne & Stenstrom,
Cecilia. (2022). Delineating the successful features of research data
management training: A systematic review. International Journal for Academic
Development, 27(3), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1898399
Palmer, Carole; Weber, Nicholas M.; Renear, Allen H. & Muñoz, Trevor. (2013).
Foundations of data curation: The pedagogy and practice of" purposeful work"
with research data. Archives Journal, Vol 3. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/78099
Pampel, Heinz; Vierkant, Paul; Scholze, Frank; Bertelmann, Roland; Kindling, Maxi;
Klump, Jens; Goebelbecker, Hans Jurgen; Gundlach, Jens; Schirmbacher, Peter
& Dierolf, Uwe. (2013). Making research data repositories visible: the re3data.
org registry. PloS one, 8(11), e78080.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078080
Pampel, Heinz & Dallmeier-Tiessen, Sünje. (2014). Open research data: From vision
to practice. In: Bartling, S., Friesike, S. (eds). Opening science: The evolving
guide on how the Internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly
publishing, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_14
Pasquetto, Irene V.; Randles, Bernadette M. & Borgman, Christine L. (2017). On the
Reuse of Scientific Data. Data Science Journal, 16. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-
2017-008
Pasquetto, Irene V. (2018). From open data to knowledge production: Biomedical
data sharing and unpredictable data reuses [Doctoral dissertation]. UCLA.
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4nd5j5jp
Pasquetto, Irene. (2019). Do scientists reuse open data? [Blog Post]. Caos by Sage
Bionetworks. https://medium.com/voices-from-the-open-sciencemovement/
by-irene-pasquetto-bac8bc02afdc
Paulus, Frieder M.; Cruz, Nicole & Krach, Sören. (2018). The impact factor fallacy.
Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1487. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01487
Peng, Robert D. (2011). Reproducible research in computational science. Science,
334(6060), 1226-1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847
Pennock, Maureen. (2007). Digital curation: A life-cycle approach to managing and
preserving usable digital information. Library & Archives Journal, 1.
https://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/m.pennock/publications/docs/libarch_
curation.pdf
Peset, Fernada; Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael; Blasco-Gil, Yolanda & Ferrer-Sapena,
Antonia. (2017). Datos abiertos de investigación. Camino recorrido y cuestiones
pendientes. Anales de Documentación, 20(1).
https://doi.org/10.6018/analesdoc.20.1.272101
Pilat, Dirk & Fukasaku, Yukiko. (2007). OECD principles and guidelines for access to
research data from public funding. Data Science Journal, 6, OD4-OD11.
https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.6.OD4
Pinfield, Stephen; Cox, Andrew M. & Smith, Jen. (2014). Research data management
and libraries: Relationships, activities, drivers and influences. PLoS One, 9(12),
e114734. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114734
Pinfield, Stephen; Salter, Jennifer & Bath, Peter A. (2016). The “total cost of
publication” in a hybrid open¿access environment: Institutional approaches to
funding journal article¿processing charges in combination with subscriptions.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(7), 1751-
1766. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23446
Pinfield, Stephen; Salter, Jennifer & Bath, Peter A. (2017). A “Gold¿centric”
implementation of open access: Hybrid journals, the “Total cost of publication,”
and policy development in the UK and beyond. Journal of the Association for
Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2248-2263.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23742
Piwowar, Heather; Day, Roger. S. & Fridsma, Douglas. B. (2007). Sharing detailed
research data is associated with increased citation rate. PloS one, 2(3), e308.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000308
Piwowar, Heather & Chapman, Wendy W. (2010). Public sharing of research
datasets: a pilot study of associations. Journal of informetrics, 4(2), 148-156.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.11.010
Piwowar, Heather & Vision, Todd J. (2013). Data reuse and the open data citation
advantage. PeerJ, 1, e175. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.175
Piwowar, Heather; Priem, Jason., Larivière, Vincent; Alperín, Juan Pablo; Matthias,
Lisa; Norlander, Bree; Farley, Asheley; West, Jevin & Haustein, Stefanie. (2018).
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open
Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
Piwowar, Heather; Priem, Jason, & Orr, Richard. (2019). The Future of OA: A largescale
analysis projecting Open Access publication and readership. BioRxiv,
795310. https://doi.org/10.1101/795310
Plesser, Hans E. (2018). Reproducibility vs. replicability: a brief history of a confused
terminology. Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 11, 76.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2017.00076
Plomp, Esther; Dintzner, Nicolas; Teperek, Marta & Dunning, Alastair. (2019).
Cultural obstacles to research data management and sharing at TU
Delft. Insights, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.484
Priya, Arya. (2021). Case study methodology of qualitative research: Key attributes
and navigating the conundrums in its application. Sociological Bulletin, 70(1),
94-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318
R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R
Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
Reales, Guillermo & Wallace, Chris. (2023). Sharing GWAS summary statistics results
in more citations. Communications Biology, 6(1), 116.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04497-8
Robinson-Garcia, Nicolás; Costas, Rodrigo & van Leeuwen, Thed N. (2020). Open
Access uptake by universities worldwide. PeerJ, 8, e9410.
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9410
Rod, Alisa B.; Hervieux, Sandy & Lee, NuRee (2023). We will meet you where you are.
The Development and Evaluation of Tailored Training for the Management of
Research Data.
https://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsand
preconfs/2023/WeWillMeetYouWhereYouAre.pdf
Rodrigues, Rosângela Schwarz; Abadal, Ernest & De Araújo, Breno Kricheldorf
Hermes. (2020). Open access publishers: The new players. PloS one, 15(6),
e0233432. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233432
Roche, Dominique G.; Kruuk, Loeske E. B.; Lanfear, Robert & Binning, Sandra A.
(2015). Public data archiving in ecology and evolution: how well are we doing?
PLoS biology, 13(11), e1002295. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002295
Rosati, Kristen B. (2022). Legal Compliance and Good Data Stewardship in Data
Sharing Plans. Harvard Data Science Review, 4(3).
https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.5ff070bf
Ross-Hellauer, Tony; Reichmann, Stefan; Cole, Niki Lisa; Fessl, Angela; Klebel,
Thomas & Pontika, Nancy. (2022). Dynamics of cumulative advantage and
threats to equity in open science: a scoping review. Royal Society Open
Science, 9(1), 211032. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211032
Salatino, Maximiliano. (2018). Más allá de la indexación: Circuitos de publicación de
Ciencias Sociales en Argentina y Brasil. Dados, 61(1), 255-287.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/001152582018152
Salatino, Maximiliano & Banzato, Guillermo. (2021). Confines históricos del acceso
abierto latinoamericano. En Conocimiento abierto en América Latina:
Trayectoria y desafíos, 79-115. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2v88f34
Salazar, A.; Freán, P.; Chiappero, G. Quintana, D.; Bongiovani, P.C.; Alfieri, A. (2023).
Implementación de Identificadores Persistentes (PID) para aumentar el
impacto del Repositorio De Datos Académicos RDA-UNR (dataverse.unr.edu.ar).
XVII Jornadas de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. Universidad Nacional de
Rosario. https://jornadasctei.unr.edu.ar/implementacion-de-identificadorespersistentes-
pid-para-aumentar-el-impacto-del-repositorio-de-datosacademicos-
rda-unr-dataverse-unr-edu-ar/
San Martín, Patricia Silvana; Guarnieri, Griselda; Rodríguez, Guillermo Luján;
Bongiovani, Paola Carolina & Sartorio, Alejandro Roberto. (2010). El dispositivo
hipermedial dinámico Campus virtual UNR. RepHipUNR
http://hdl.handle.net/2133/1390
San Martín, Patricia Silvana; Bongiovani, Paola Carolina; Casali, Ana & Deco, Claudia.
(2015). Study on Perspectives Regarding Deposit on Open Access Repositories
in the Context of Public Universities in the Central-Eastern Region of
Argentina. Scholarly and Research Communication, 6(1).
https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2015v6n1a145
Sayogo, Djoko Sigit & Pardo, Theresa A. (2013). Exploring the determinants of
scientific data sharing: Understanding the motivation to publish research data.
Government information quarterly, 30, 19-31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.011
Schmidt, Birgit; Gemeinholzer, Birgit & Treloar, Andrew. (2016). Open data in global
environmental research: The Belmont Forum’s open data survey. PloS one,
11(1), e0146695. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146695
Schöpfel, Joachim; Ferrant, Coline; André, Francis & Fabre, Renaud. (2018). Research
data management in the French National Research Center (CNRS). Data
Technologies and Applications, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 248-265.
https://doi.org/10.1108/DTA-01-2017-0005
Schöpfel, Joachim & Azeroual, Otmane. (2021, April). Rewarding Research Data
Management. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 (pp.
446-450). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442442.3451367
Sierra Bravo, Restituto. (1981). Ciencias Sociales. Análisis Estadístico y Modelos
Matemáticos. Paraninfo.
SCOPE Framework for Research Evaluation. (2021). https://inorms.net/scopeframework-
for-research-evaluation/
Shankar, Kalpana & Cushing, Amber. (2016). Creating an evidence-based digital
curation curriculum for Ireland: Case study at University College Dublin. An
Leabharlann, 25(2). http://hdl.handle.net/10197/8124
Scott, W. Richard. (2004). Institutional theory. En G. Ritzer Encyclopedia of Social
Theory (408-414). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Scott, W. Richard. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and
identities. Sage publications.
Simard, Marc André ; Ghiasi, Gila ; Mongeon, Philippe & Larivière, Vicent. (2022).
National differences in dissemination and use of open access literature. Plos
one, 17(8), e0272730. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272730
Simons, Natasha; Goodey, Greg; Hardeman, Megan; Clare, Connie; Gonzales, Sara;
Strange, Damon; Smith, Graham; Kipnis, Daniel; Iida, Keisuke; Miyairi, Nobuko;
Tshetsha, Veliswa; Ramokgola, Mankaleme; Makhera, Pfano & Barbour, Ginny.
(2021). The state of open data 2021. Digital Science.
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17061347.v1
Phillips, Dan & Smit, Michael. (2021). How To Write A (Good) Data Description:
Developing Best Practice. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4709835
Sorbonne Declaration on Research Data Rights (2020).
https://sorbonnedatadeclaration.eu/
SPARC (2022). Fact Sheet: White House OSTP Memo on Ensuring Free, Immediate,
and Equitable Access to Federally Funded Research. https://sparcopen.org/ourwork/
2022-updated-ostp-policy-guidance/fact-sheet-white-house-ostp-memoon-
ensuring-free-immediate-and-equitable-access-to-federally-fundedresearch/
Stall, Shelley; Martone, Maryann E.; Chandramouliswaran, Iswhar; Federer, Lisa;
Gautier, Julian; Gibson, Jennifer; Hahnel, Mark; Larkin, Jennie; Pfeiffer, Nicole;
Sedora, Brian; Sim, Ida; Smith, Tim; Van Gulick, Anna E.; Walker, Erin; Wood,
Julie; Zaringhalam, Maryam & Zigoni, Alberto. (2023). Generalist Repository
Comparison Chart (3.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7946938
Stenta, Hernán; Riccardi, Gerardo; Basile, Pedro & Scuderi, Carlos. (2022). Datos de:
Modelación matemática hidrológica-hidráulica del escurrimiento superficial en
la cuenca del A° Pavón (Santa Fe, Argentina) [Data set]. RDA
UNR. https://doi.org/10.57715/UNR/THC0KS
Strecker, Dorothea; Axtman, Alexandra; Bertelmann, Ronald; Pal, Jiban K; Cousijn,
H; Lindenmann, Iris; Neidiger, Charlotte; Wiit; Michael; Ulrich, Robert R.;
Upmeier, Urne; Weisweiler, Nina Leonie & Wright, Sarah J. (2024). Metadata
Schema for the Description of Research Data Repositories: version 4.0.
https://doi.org/10.48440/re3.014
Stuart, David; Baynes, Grace; Hrynaszkiewicz, Iain; Allin, Katie; Penny, Dan; Lucraft,
Mithu & Astell, Mathias. (2018). Practical challenges for researchers in data
sharing. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1184
Suhr, Bettina; Dungl, Johanna & Stocker, Alexander. (2020). Search, reuse and
sharing of research data in materials science and engineering—A qualitative
interview study. PloS one, 15(9), e0239216.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239216
Tabachnick, Barbara G.; Fidell, Linda S. & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate
statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson
Tammaro, Anna Maria; Matusiak, Krystyna K.; Sposito, Frank Andreas; Pervanm Ana
& Casarosa, Vittore. (2017). Understanding roles and responsibilities of data
curators: an international perspective. Libellarium: journal for the research of
writing, books, & cultural heritage institutions, 9(2).
https://doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v9i2.286
Tang, Rong & Hu, Zhan. (2019). Providing research data management (RDM)
services in libraries: Preparedness, roles, challenges, and training for RDM
practice. Data and Information Management, 3(2), 84-101.
https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2019-0009
Tenopir, Carol; Allard, Suzie; Douglass, Kimberly; Aydinoglu, Arsev Umur; Wu, Lei;
Read, Eleanor; Manoff, Maribeth & Frame, Mike. (2011). Data sharing by
scientists: practices and perceptions. PloS one, 6(6), e21101.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
Tenopir, Carol; Sandusky, Robert J.; Allard, Suzie & Birch, Ben. (2014). Research data
management services in academic research libraries and perceptions of
librarians. Library & Information Science Research, 36(2), 84-90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2013.11.003
Tenopir, Carol; Dalton, Elizabeth D; Allard, Suzie; Frame, Mike; Pjesivac, Ivanka;
Birch, Ben; Pollock, Danielle & Dorsett, Kristina. (2015). Changes in data sharing
and data reuse practices and perceptions among scientists worldwide. PloS
one, 10(8), e0134826. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134826
Tenopir, Carol; Christian, Lisa., Allard, Suzie., & Borycz, Josh. (2018). Research data
sharing: Practices and attitudes of geophysicists. Earth and Space Science,
5(12), 891-902. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EA000461
Tenopir, Carol; Rice, Natalie M.; Allard, Suzie; Baird, Lynn; Borycz, Josh; Christian,
Lisa; Grant, Bruce; Olendorf, Robert y Sandusky, Robert. J. (2020). Data sharing,
management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists
worldwide. PloS one, 15(3), e0229003.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229003
The Turing Way Community. (2022). The Turing Way: A handbook for reproducible,
ethical and collaborative research. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7625728
Thelwall, Mike & Kousha, Kavian. (2017). Do journal data sharing mandates work?
Life sciences evidence from Dryad. Aslib Journal of Information Management.
https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2016-0159
Torres-Salinas, Daniel. (2020). Ritmo de crecimiento diario de la producción
científica sobre Covid-19. Análisis en bases de datos y repositorios en acceso
abierto. El profesional de la información, 29(2).
http://hdl.handle.net/10481/66008
Towse, John N.; Ellis, David A. & Towse, Andrea S. (2021). Opening Pandora’s Box:
Peeking inside Psychology’s data sharing practices, and seven
recommendations for change. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 1455-1468.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01486-1
Unal, Yurdagül; Chowdhury, Gobinda; Kurbano¿lu, Serap; Boustany, Joumana &
Walton, Geoff. (2019). Research data management and data sharing behaviour
of university researchers. Information Research: an international electronic
journal, 24(1). https://informationr.net/ir/24-1/isic2018/isic1818.html
University of Cambridge (2023). Data champions.
https://www.data.cam.ac.uk/intro-data-champions
Uzwyshyn, Ray. (2016). Online Research Data Repositories: The What, When Why
and How. Computers in Libraries, 36(3), pp. 18-21.
https://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/apr16/Uzwyshyn--Research-Data-
Repositories.shtml
UNESCO. (2021). Recomendación de la UNESCO sobre la Ciencia abierta.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949_spa
Universidad Nacional de Rosario (2016). Resolución de Consejo Superior Nº
1842/2016. RepHipUNR http://hdl.handle.net/2133/12981
Universidad Nacional de Rosario (2017). Resolución Nº 5425/2017. RepHipUNR
http://hdl.handle.net/2133/12982
Universidad Nacional de Rosario (2018). Resolución Nº 2159/2018. RepHipUNR
http://hdl.handle.net/2133/12983
Universidad Nacional de Rosario. (2020). Capacitación "Gestión de datos de
investigación en la UNR" [Video]. YouTube.
https://youtu.be/RCgnARvttx8?si=DJIdGvyl0cZ6dX9g
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1991). Federal policy for the
protection of human subjects (“Common rule”).
https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/commonrule/
index.html
Van House, Nancy A. (2003). Digital libraries and collaborative knowledge. Digital
library use: Social practice in design and evaluation (271-95).
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2424.003.0015
Van den Eynden, Veerle; Knight, Gareth; Vlad, Anca; Radler, Barry; Tenopir, Carol;
Leon, David A.; Manista, Frank; Whitworth, Jimmy & Corti, Louise. (2016). Survey
of Wellcome researchers and their attitudes to open research.
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4055448.v1
Vicente-Sáez, Rubén & Martínez-Fuentes, Clara. (2018). Open Science now: A
systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of business
research, 88, 428-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043
Voigt, Paul & Von dem Bussche, Axel. (2017). The EU general data protection
regulation (GDPR). A Practical Guide, 1st Ed., Cham: Springer International
Publishing, 10(3152676), 10-5555. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57959-7
Volk, Carol J.; Lucero, Yasmin & Barnas, Katie. (2014). Why is data sharing in
collaborative natural resource efforts so hard and what can we do to improve
it?. Environmental management, 53, 883-893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-
014-0258-2
Wallis, Jillian C., Rolando, Elizabeth & Borgman, Christine L. (2013). If we share data,
will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and
technology. PloS one, 8(7), e67332.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067332
Wildgaard, Loma & Rantasaari, Jukka. (2022). RDA Professionalising Data
Stewardship - Data Stewardship Landscape Initial Report.
https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00076
Wilkinson, Mark D. ; Dumontier, Michel ; Aalbersberg, IJsbrand Jan ; Appleton,
Gabrielle; Axton, Myles; Baak, Arie; Blomberg, Niklas; Boiten, Jan-Willem; da
Silva Santos, Luiz Bonino; Bourne, Philip E.; Bouwman, Jildau; Brookes, Anthony
J.; Clark, Tim; Crosas, Mercè; Dillo, Ingrid; Dumon, Olivier; Edmunds, Scott;
Evelo, Chris T.; Finkers, Richard; Gonzalez-Beltran, Alejandra; Gray, Alasdair J.G.;
Groth, Paul; Goble, Carole; Grethe, Jeffrey S. & Mons, Barend. The FAIR Guiding
Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data, 3(1),
1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Wittrock, Christian; Forsberg, Ellen Marie; Pols, Auke ; Macnaghten, Philip & Ludwig,
David. (2021). Implementing responsible research and innovation:
Organisational and national conditions (p. 120). Springer Nature.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54286-3
Woltman, Heather; Feldstain, Andrea; MacKay, J. Christine., & Rocchi, Meredith.
(2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in quantitative
methods for psychology, 8(1), 52-69.
https://www.tqmp.org/RegularArticles/vol08-1/p052/p052.pdf
Woods, Helen Bucley & Pinfield, Stephen. (2021). Incentivising research data
sharing: a scoping review. Wellcome open research, 6.
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17286.1
World Medical Association. (2013). Declaration of Helsinki.
https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki
Wunderlich, Richard. (1974). The scientific ethos: A clarification. British Journal of
Sociology, 373-377. https://doi.org/10.2307/589402
Yoon, Ayoung & Kim, Youngseek. (2017). Social scientists' data reuse behaviors:
Exploring the roles of attitudinal beliefs, attitudes, norms, and data
repositories. Library & Information Science Research, 39(3), 224-233.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.07.008
Yoon, Ayoung. (2017). Data reusers' trust development. Journal of the Association
for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 946-956.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23730
Zenk-Möltgen, Wolfgang Zenk; Akdeniz, Esra; Katsanidou, Alexia; Naßhoven,
Verena & Balaban, Ebru. (2018). Factors influencing the data sharing behavior
of researchers in sociology and political science. Journal of documentation,
74(5), 1053-1073. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2017-0126
Zhu, Yimei. (2020). Open-access policy and data-sharing practice in UK academia.
Journal of Information Science, 46(1), 41-52.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551518823174
Zimmerman, Ann. (2007). Not by metadata alone: The use of diverse forms of
knowledge to locate data for reuse. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7,
5-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-007-0015-8
Zuiderwijk, Anneke & Spiers, Helen. (2019). Sharing and re-using open data: A case
study of motivations in astrophysics. International Journal of Information
Management, 49, 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.024
Zuiderwijk, Anneke; Shinde, Rhytima & Jeng, Wei. (2020). What drives and inhibits
researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature
review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption. PLoS one,
15(9), e0239283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239283